The US might have been little-touched by the scorched earth of world war, and perhaps our feel-good stance astride the planet delayed the decay somewhat. As to the way to carry out the new rite: one possible model is the traditional usage, which expresses the ministerial functions, by having the priest or deacon place the host in the hand of the communicant. The same Instruction contained a reminder that the laws of the Church and the writings of the Fathers give ample witness of a supreme reverence and utmost caution toward the Eucharist and that this must continue. No wonder so many people there have given up on Christianity. Upper Volta and Niger, 20 February 1970 The infamous coffee cup masses Dorothy Day describes in her book may have had good intentions behind them, but the way they appeared to trivialize the Holy Sacrifice of the mass lent no dignity to the then new Pauline mass. This helps explain why this line of thought isnt gaining much traction except on the right fringe. Pope Benedict XVI 1927-2022 tribute page and access to resources here. I have celebrated Mass in places where there is no Communion in the hand and yet have observed some people approach the Eucharist in a slovenly and distracted manner with nary a trace of reverence in sight. On the part of both the minister and the recipient, whenever the host is placed in the hand of a communicant there must be careful concern and caution, especially about particles that might fall from the hosts. A quick example will be found . There are many devout Catholics who find this practice helpful. Japan, 27 June 1970 Papua and New Guinea, 28 April 1976 47), and says of the Communion Chant that "its purpose [is] to express the spiritual union of the communicants by means of the unity of their voices, to show gladness of heart, and to bring out more clearly the 'communitarian' character of the procession to receive the Eucharist" (no. . For whatever reason, reception on the hand does not appear to convey the same level of reverence in the public consciousness as reception on the tongue. In an even more elevated tone, Ephrem the Syrian, in a stunning passage, invites the Christian communicant to feel awe at what is placed in his or her hand, since even the Seraph did not take the divine coal with his hand, nor did the prophet Isaiah eat it (see: Isa 6:6). Never receive Holy Communion by extending only one hand. St. Cyril of Jerusalem in 348 gave this instruction to his congregation:When you approach Holy Communion, make the left hand into a throne for the right, which will receive the King. It is bad if it makes us prideful/judgmental and distracts from more important things. Communion in the hand was officially permitted in the United States in 1977, following an indult that is, special permission given by the Congregation for Divine Sacraments in 1969. Middle Africa, 3 February 1970 Why? Whatever procedure is adopted, care must be taken not to allow particles of the eucharistic bread to fall or be scattered. What if we were passionate about all that? They partake not of Him that is in them, they perceive Him not. Ive updated the post. At Christ's invitation, extended by the priest acting in Christ's person: "Blessed are those called to the supper of the Lamb," the members of the community move forward to share in the sacred meal, to receive the Body and Blood of Christ which is the sign and the source of their unity. http://www.newliturgicalmovement.org/2014/03/truth-about-communion-in-hand-while.html#.Wpa2wdIUnGg. The Holy See has made it abundantly clear that both manners of reception of Communion on the tongue and in the hand are permitted, that Communion should be received reverently, and that the manner of reception should not become an occasion of division in the church. That the conference had voted twice but failed to approve the practice and then only won the third vote by gathering absentee votes which is the article claims was unlawful? IMHO no, contrary to what some real traddies may say. He can freely share with the faithful his reasons for preferring to adhere to the traditional practice and encourage the faithful to continue doing so. Has the Holy Eucharist any other effect? Q. Biting, tearing, casting aspersions on the faith of other Catholics: this is a damnable situation in the Church. [9] Theodore of Mopsuestia, Catechetical Homilies 6. For you hear the words, the Body of Christ and respond Amen. Be then a member of the Body of Christ that your Amen may be true (St. Augustine, Sermon 272: PL 38, 1247). Australia, 26 September 1975 The practice of communion on the tongue with the use of patens in the West, and in both kinds on a spoon with a drop cloth in the East, moreover, are natural developments from the concern of the Early Church to prevent Eucharistic mishaps. It is also difficult to ensure that the person who receives Communion effectively consumes the host. Several readers pointed out that I made no mention of a text of St. Cyril when mentioning the historical foundations of the practice. 51 (Feb), pg 62). Your email address will not be published. It also rules out arguing for an intrinsic link between a rejection of the true presence and communion in the handthe Fathers, on the whole, speak of Christs presence in the Eucharist in highly realistic terms and also received on the hand. I dont read any statement with canonical force saying that only those countries may apply for an indult. For this alone is the eating referred to by our Lord ( John 6:58 ). Paul VI had a measure of it in 1974, and we hav emostly missed the wisdom of Evangelii Nuntiandi. Gross Alexander NPNF 13, ed. Hence any baptized Catholic who is not prevented by law must be admitted to Holy Communion. It is now August 2020 and I can say that you have been proven wrong. Please take responsibility for the lies, the bile, and the sinful stuff. [13] In the far-flung regions of the empireGaul (modern-day France and Spain) we have the witness of Caesarius of Arles[14] and the council of Auxerre,[15] and in England, we have the Venerable Bede. The two ways of receiving communion can without question take place during the same liturgical service. Malaysia and Singapore, 3 October 1977, * * * * *. [3] Augustine, Answer to Petilian 2.23.53and Against Parmenian 2.7.13. In this way, the practice of Communion in the hand is different from other liturgical elements restored after centuries of disuse, such as the prayer of the faithful and the exchange of peace. 5.21, trans. [23] John Chrysostom, hom. I beg to differ. The life of Christ, the Holy Spirit, animates each of us individually, and all of us corporately and guides us together in our efforts to become one in Christ. The way we communicate the Gospel message is almost as important as the Gospel itself. Archbishop Anthony Fisher, OP, of Sydney published an excellent paper on the topic of conscience and authority which can be found at:https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=7833or, in a slightly briefer form athttps://zenit.org/articles/bishop-fisher-on-conscience-and-authority/. However, when they receive Communion standing, it is recommended that the faithful make appropriate reverence, according to the norms established, before receiving the Sacrament. This is in no way meant to refer to those who, receiving the Lord Jesus in the hand, do so with profound reverence and devotion, in those countries where this practice has been authorized.. [2] Cyprian, On the Good of Patience 14, On the Lapsed 16 and 26,and Letter 55.9. My overarching point in all this (as someone who receives comfortably in both manners) is that I dont think common concerns with reception in the hand have been treated with adequate seriousness by many its defenders. In approaching therefore, come not with your wrists extended, or your fingers spread; but make your left hand a throne for the right, as for that which is to receive a King. This would be done especially if it is very difficult or impossible to fulfill the necessary conditions as outlined in the documents above. For it is a deed fraught with destruction to take the tongue which serve such awesome mysteries, which has become purpled with a blood so precious, which has become a sword of gold and to change its course to abuse, insolence and ribald jests. The elements were placed in the hands (not in the mouth) of each communicant by the clergy who were present, or, according to Justin, by the deacons alone, amid singing of psalms by the congregation (Psalm 34), with the words: The body of Christ; The blood of Christ, the cup of life; to each of which the recipient responded Amen. (eminent Church historian Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church: Ante-Nicene Christianity: A.D. 100-325 [Vol. Our souls ought to be purer than they, more holy, more brilliant. Most often when speaking of reverence, however, the Fathers emphasize two main things: 1) that every precaution should be taken lest the Eucharist fall to the ground and 2) that communicants should be from serious sin and quarrels with other Christians. It also happens, on occasion, that the free choice of those who prefer to continue the practice of receiving the Eucharist on the tongue is not taken into account in those places where the distribution of Communion in the hand has been authorized. 160). Among Catholics, there is a sincere difference of opinion with respect to the opportunity of this practice, as to its possible spiritual benefits or detriments. Jamaica, 12 March 1970 We are the Body of Christ, moving forward to receive the Christ who makes us one with himself and with one another. Ever since the InstructionMemoriale Dominithree years ago, some of the conferences of bishops have been requesting the Apostolic See for the faculty to allow ministers distributing communion to place the eucharistic bread in the hand of the faithful. To commemorate the death of Christ: "This do in remembrance of me." 2. It is simply reading too much into this practice, and it is not correct to support something one favors by denigrating another practice. Basil the Great, 330-379 stated, "The right to receive Holy Communion in the hand is permitted only in times of persecution." This statement may very well have been made in response to St. Cyril of Jerusalem in 348. It is advisable, therefore, that the rite be introduced gradually and in the beginning within small, better prepared groups and in favorable settings. Phillip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1889). LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Catholics want to know if it is allowed for their bishops and priests to require Communion be received only on in the hand instead of on the tongue. Todd, yes, the Church as a whole is growing thanks to the great efforts of missionaries in Africa and Asia (many are now coming back here), and yes, more people are receiving the Sacraments now than ever. I used the wordnecessarilyas an equivalent to in and of itself. There is no inherent reason why Communion in the hand is less reverent.
Orange Curacao Calories,
Sherwin Williams Dovetail Front Door,
Steve Kinser Daughter,
Is There A 16 Parkside Lane San Francisco,
Attributeerror: 'str' Object Has No Attribute 'decode' Keras Load_weights,
Articles OTHER